Journal of Clinical Medicine (Feb 2023)

Anti-dsDNA B-Cell ELISpot as a Monitoring and Flare Prediction Tool in SLE Patients

  • Albert Pérez-Isidro,
  • Marc Xipell,
  • Arturo Llobell,
  • Noemí De Moner,
  • Gema M. Lledó,
  • Ricard Cervera,
  • Sergio Prieto-González,
  • Luis F. Quintana,
  • Gerard Espinosa,
  • Mila García-Ormaechea,
  • Estíbaliz Ruiz-Ortiz,
  • Odette Viñas

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041295
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 4
p. 1295

Abstract

Read online

Anti-dsDNA autoantibodies quantification and complement levels are widely used to monitor disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, better biomarkers are still needed. We hypothesised whether the dsDNA antibody-secreting B-cells could be a complementary biomarker in disease activity and prognosis of SLE patients. Fifty-two SLE patients were enrolled and followed for up to 12 months. Additionally, 39 controls were included. An activity cut-off (comparing active and non-active patients according to clinical SLEDAI-2K) was established for SLE-ELISpot, chemiluminescence and Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence tests (≥11.24, ≥374.1 and ≥1, respectively). Assays performances together with complement status were compared regarding major organ involvement at the inclusion and flare-up risk prediction after follow-up. SLE-ELISpot showed the best performance in identifying active patients. High SLE-ELISpot results were associated with haematological involvement and, after follow-up, with an increased hazard ratio for disease flare-up (3.4) and especially renal flare (6.5). Additionally, the combination of hypocomplementemia and high SLE-ELISpot results increased those risks up to 5.2 and 32.9, respectively. SLE-ELISpot offers complementary information to anti-dsDNA autoantibodies to evaluate the risk of a flare-up in the following year. In some cases, adding SLE-ELISpot to the current follow-up protocol for SLE patients can improve clinicians’ personalised care decisions.

Keywords