Neurology and Therapy (Mar 2023)

Estimated Societal Value of Lecanemab in Patients with Early Alzheimer’s Disease Using Simulation Modeling

  • Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared,
  • Weicheng Ye,
  • Aditya Sardesai,
  • Henri Folse,
  • Ameya Chavan,
  • Kang Kang,
  • Quanwu Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00460-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 3
pp. 795 – 814

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with memory, cognitive, and behavioral deficits, and brings significant economic burden on caregivers and healthcare systems. This study aims to estimate the long-term societal value of lecanemab plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone, corresponding to a range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds based on the phase III CLARITY AD trial readouts from both the US payer and societal perspectives. Methods An evidence-based model was developed to simulate the effects of lecanemab on disease progression in early AD using interconnected predictive equations based on longitudinal clinical and biomarker data derived from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). The model was informed with the results of the phase III CLARITY AD trial and published literature. Key model outcomes included patient life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and total costs of both the direct and indirect costs of patients and caregivers over a lifetime horizon. Results Patients treated with lecanemab plus SoC gained an additional 0.62 years of life versus SoC alone (6.23 years vs. 5.61 years). The mean time on lecanemab was 3.91 years, and the treatment was associated with an increase in patient QALYs of 0.61 and an increase in total QALYs of 0.64 when both patient and caregiver utilities were considered. The model estimated that the annual value of lecanemab for the US payer perspective was US$18,709–35,678 ($19,710–37,351 for societal perspective) at the WTP threshold of $100,000–200,000 per QALY gained, respectively. Scenario analyses of patient subgroups, time horizon, input sources, treatment stopping rules, and treatment dosing were conducted to explore the impact of alternative assumptions on the model results. Conclusion The economic study suggested that lecanemab plus SoC would improve health and humanistic (quality of life) outcomes and reduce economic burden for patients and caregivers in early AD.

Keywords