Coluna/Columna ()

THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE

  • MURILO TAVARES DAHER,
  • PEDRO FELISBINO JUNIOR,
  • ADRIANO PASSÁGLIA ESPERIDIÃO,
  • BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO ARAÚJO,
  • ANDRÉ LUIZ PASSOS CARDOSO,
  • WILSON ELOY PIMENTA JUNIOR,
  • SÉRGIO DAHER

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-185120161503157849
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 3
pp. 213 – 218

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT Objectives: To present the clinical and radiographic results of patients with thoracic disc herniation treated by the posterior approach, according to location and type of hernia (à la carte). Methods: We evaluated thirteen patients (14 hernias) treated by the posterior approach. Eight (61.5%) patients were male and the mean age was 53 years (34-81). Clinical evaluation was performed by the Frankel and JOA modified scales. All the patients underwent the posterior approach, which was performed by facetectomy, transpedicular approach, transpedicular + partial body resection, costotransversectomy or costotransversectomy + reconstruction with CAGE. Results: The mean follow-up was 2 years and 6 months (11-77 months). Of the 14 operated hernias, six (43%) were lateral, 2 (14%) paramedian, and 6 (43%) central. Seven were soft (50%) and seven were calcified. The transfacet approach was carried out in 5 cases (36%), transpedicular in 1 case (7%), transpedicular + partial body resection in 4 (29%), costotransversectomy in 3 (21%), and costotransversectomy + CAGE in one case (7%). The majority of patients with lateral hernia (5/6) were subjected to transfacet decompression and in cases of central and paramedian hernias, all patients underwent decompression, which is more extensive. Conclusions: The posterior approach is safe and effective, and the best approach must be chosen based on location and type of the herniation and the surgeon's experience.

Keywords