European Radiology Experimental (Nov 2024)

Quantification of breast biopsy clip marker artifact on routine breast MRI sequences: a phantom study

  • Christian Kremser,
  • Leonhard Gruber,
  • Matthias Dietzel,
  • Birgit Amort,
  • Wolfram Santner,
  • Martin Daniaux

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00525-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To investigate the artifact sizes of four common breast clip-markers on a standard breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol in an in vitro phantom model. Methods Using 1.5-T and 3-T whole-body scanners with an 18-channel breast coil, artifact dimensions of four breast biopsy markers in an agarose-gel phantom were measured by two readers on images obtained with the following sequences: T2-weighted fast spin-echo short inversion time fat-suppressed inversion-recovery with magnitude reconstruction (T2-TIRM); T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo with fat suppression (T1_FL3D), routinely used for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), including a readout segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE-DWI) and echo-planar imaging sequence (EPI-DWI). After outlining the artifacts by freehand regions of interest, sagittal and lateral diameters in axial images were measured. Results Interreader agreement for artifact size quantification was high, depending on the sequence (80.4–94.8%). Overall, the size, shape, and appearance of artifacts depended on clip type and MRI sequence. The artifact size ranged from 5.7 × 8.5 mm2 to 13.4 × 17.7 mm2 at 1.5 T and from 6.6 × 8.2 mm2 to 17.7 × 20.7 mm2 at 3 T. Clip artifacts were largest on EPI-DWI and RESOLVE-DWI (p ≤ 0.016). In three out of four clips, T2-TIRM showed the smallest artifact (p ≤ 0.002), while in one clip the artifact was smallest on T1_FL3D (p = 0.026). With the exception of one clip in the RESOLVE sequence, all clips showed a decrease in the artifact area from DWI to ADC images (p ≤ 0.037). Conclusion Breast clip-marker MRI artifact appearances depend on clip type, field strength, and sequence and may reach a significant size, potentially obscuring smaller lesions and hindering accurate assessment of breast tumors. Relevance statement Considerable variations in artifact size and characteristics across different breast clips, MRI sequences, and field strengths exist. Awareness of these artifacts and their characteristics is essential to ensure accurate interpretation of scans and appropriate treatment planning. Key Points Awareness of breast clip artifacts is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI. The appearance of artifacts depends on breast clip type, field strength, and sequence. Clip-related artifacts might hinder the visibility of small lesions. Graphical Abstract

Keywords