Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Apr 2022)

A Sensorless Modular Multiobjective Control Algorithm for Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Clinical Pilot Study

  • Martin Maw,
  • Martin Maw,
  • Martin Maw,
  • Thomas Schlöglhofer,
  • Thomas Schlöglhofer,
  • Thomas Schlöglhofer,
  • Christiane Marko,
  • Philipp Aigner,
  • Philipp Aigner,
  • Christoph Gross,
  • Gregor Widhalm,
  • Gregor Widhalm,
  • Anne-Kristin Schaefer,
  • Michael Schima,
  • Franziska Wittmann,
  • Dominik Wiedemann,
  • Francesco Moscato,
  • Francesco Moscato,
  • D'Anne Kudlik,
  • Robert Stadler,
  • Daniel Zimpfer,
  • Heinrich Schima,
  • Heinrich Schima,
  • Heinrich Schima

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.888269
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundContemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) mainly operate at a constant speed, only insufficiently adapting to changes in patient demand. Automatic physiological speed control promises tighter integration of the LVAD into patient physiology, increasing the level of support during activity and decreasing support when it is excessive.MethodsA sensorless modular control algorithm was developed for a centrifugal LVAD (HVAD, Medtronic plc, MN, USA). It consists of a heart rate-, a pulsatility-, a suction reaction—and a supervisor module. These modules were embedded into a safe testing environment and investigated in a single-center, blinded, crossover, clinical pilot trial (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04786236). Patients completed a protocol consisting of orthostatic changes, Valsalva maneuver and submaximal bicycle ergometry in constant speed and physiological control mode in randomized sequence. Endpoints for the study were reduction of suction burden, adequate pump speed and flowrate adaptations of the control algorithm for each protocol item and no necessity for intervention via the hardware safety systems.ResultsA total of six patients (median age 53.5, 100% male) completed 13 tests in the intermediate care unit or in an outpatient setting, without necessity for intervention during control mode operation. Physiological control reduced speed and flowrate during patient rest, in sitting by a median of −75 [Interquartile Range (IQR): −137, 65] rpm and in supine position by −130 [−150, 30] rpm, thereby reducing suction burden in scenarios prone to overpumping in most tests [0 [−10, 2] Suction events/minute] in orthostatic upwards transitions and by −2 [−6, 0] Suction events/min in Valsalva maneuver. During submaximal ergometry speed was increased by 86 [31, 193] rpm compared to constant speed for a median flow increase of 0.2 [0.1, 0.8] L/min. In 3 tests speed could not be increased above constant set speed due to recurring suction and in 3 tests speed could be increased by up to 500 rpm with a pump flowrate increase of up to 0.9 L/min.ConclusionIn this pilot study, safety, short-term efficacy, and physiological responsiveness of a sensorless automated speed control system for a centrifugal LVAD was established. Long term studies are needed to show improved clinical outcomes.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04786236.

Keywords