Microstructural differences in the osteochondral unit of terrestrial and aquatic mammals
Irina AD Mancini,
Riccardo Levato,
Marlena M Ksiezarczyk,
Miguel Dias Castilho,
Michael Chen,
Mattie HP van Rijen,
Lonneke L IJsseldijk,
Marja Kik,
P René van Weeren,
Jos Malda
Affiliations
Irina AD Mancini
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Riccardo Levato
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Marlena M Ksiezarczyk
Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Miguel Dias Castilho
Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
Michael Chen
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Mattie HP van Rijen
Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
During evolution, animals have returned from land to water, adapting with morphological modifications to life in an aquatic environment. We compared the osteochondral units of the humeral head of marine and terrestrial mammals across species spanning a wide range of body weights, focusing on microstructural organization and biomechanical performance. Aquatic mammals feature cartilage with essentially random collagen fiber configuration, lacking the depth-dependent, arcade-like organization characteristic of terrestrial mammalian species. They have a less stiff articular cartilage at equilibrium with a significantly lower peak modulus, and at the osteochondral interface do not have a calcified cartilage layer, displaying only a thin, highly porous subchondral bone plate. This totally different constitution of the osteochondral unit in aquatic mammals reflects that accommodation of loading is the primordial function of the osteochondral unit. Recognizing the crucial importance of the microarchitecture-function relationship is pivotal for understanding articular biology and, hence, for the development of durable functional regenerative approaches for treatment of joint damage, which are thus far lacking.