PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

Evaluation of the use of unipolar voltage amplitudes for detection of myocardial scar assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure patients.

  • Uyên Châu Nguyên,
  • Francesco Maffessanti,
  • Masih Mafi-Rad,
  • Giulio Conte,
  • Stef Zeemering,
  • François Regoli,
  • Maria Luce Caputo,
  • Antonius M W van Stipdonk,
  • Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers,
  • Daniel Suerder,
  • Tiziano Moccetti,
  • Rolf Krause,
  • Frits W Prinzen,
  • Kevin Vernooy,
  • Angelo Auricchio

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180637
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 7
p. e0180637

Abstract

Read online

Validation of voltage-based scar delineation has been limited to small populations using mainly endocardial measurements. The aim of this study is to compare unipolar voltage amplitudes (UnipV) with scar on delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR).Heart failure patients who underwent DE-CMR and electro-anatomic mapping were included. Thirty-three endocardial mapped patients and 27 epicardial mapped patients were investigated. UnipV were computed peak-to-peak. Electrograms were matched with scar extent of the corresponding DE-CMR segment using a 16-segment/slice model. Non-scar was defined as 0% scar, while scar was defined as 1-100% scar extent.UnipVs were moderately lower in scar than in non-scar (endocardial 7.1 [4.6-10.6] vs. 10.3 [7.4-14.2] mV; epicardial 6.7 [3.6-10.5] vs. 7.8 [4.2-12.3] mV; both p25%, >50% and >75% scar extent with AUCs of 0.72, 0.73 and 0.76, respectively, while epicardial UnipV were poor scar predictors, independent of scar burden (AUC = 0.47-0.56). UnipV in non-scar varied widely between patients (p<0.001) and were lower in scar compared to non-scar in only 9/22 (41%) endocardial mapped patients and 4/19 (21%) epicardial mapped patients with scar.UnipV are slightly lower in scar compared to non-scar. However, significant UnipV differences between and within patients and large overlap between non-scar and scar limits the reliability of accurate scar assessment, especially in epicardial measurements and in segments with less than 75% scar extent.