BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Jun 2024)

BMI mediates the association of serum uric acid with bone health: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)

  • Jiayuan Tu,
  • Xiaoqiao Mo,
  • Xiangda Zhang,
  • Zihao Chen,
  • Lijuan Xi,
  • Chunhui Wu,
  • Xiangchan Zeng,
  • Tian Xie

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07595-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The associations between serum uric acid and osteoporosis or osteopenia remain controversial, and few studies have explored whether BMI acts as a mediators in the association between the SUA and OP/ osteopenia. Objective To explore the relationship between serum uric acid and osteoporosis or osteopenia among US adults. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the association between serum uric acid and osteoporosis or osteopenia from four cycles of NHANES. Binary logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline models were used to evaluate the association between serum uric acid and osteoporosis or osteopenia, and interaction analysis was used to test the differences between subgroups. Mediation analysis was utilized to investigate whether BMI acts as a mediator in the association between SUA and OP/ osteopenia. Results 12581 participants aged ≥ 18 years were included. A U-shape nonlinear relationship between SUA and osteoporosis or osteopenia in all people was found (P < 0.0001, P for nonlinear = 0.0287). There were significant interactions in age subgroups (P for interaction = 0.044), sex subgroups (P for interaction = 0.005), and BMI subgroups (P for interaction = 0.017). We further assessed the subgroups and found the optimal range of serum uric acid levels with a lower risk of osteoporosis or osteopenia was 357–535 µmol/L in males, 327–417 µmol/L in people aged ≥ 50 years, above 309 µmol/L in people aged < 50 years, 344–445 µmol/L in people with BMI ≥ 30, and above 308 µmol/L in people with BMI < 30. BMI fully mediated the association of SUA and OP/osteopenia, with a value of -0.0024(-0.0026–-0.0021). These results were robust in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions A complicated relationship between SUA and bone health in different populations was observed. Maintaining SUA within a specific range may be beneficial to bone health. In addition, BMI may play an important role in the association between SUA and bone health, but considering the limitations of this study, further prospective research is required.

Keywords