BJPsych Open (Sep 2024)

Pre-implementation planning for a new personalised, dementia post-diagnostic support intervention: exploring the perspective of professional stakeholders

  • Ayesha Dar,
  • Jessica Budgett,
  • Sedigheh Zabihi,
  • Ellenyd Whitfield,
  • Iain Lang,
  • Penny Rapaport,
  • Bronte Heath,
  • Margaret Ogden,
  • Rosemary Phillips,
  • Alexandra Burton,
  • Laurie Butler,
  • Danielle Wyman,
  • Juanita Hoe,
  • Jill Manthorpe,
  • Sarah Morgan-Trimmer,
  • Freya Koutsoubelis,
  • Claudia Cooper

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.733
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background Only a third of people with dementia receive a diagnosis and post-diagnostic support. An eight session, manualised, modular post-diagnostic support system (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) – family), delivered remotely by non-clinical facilitators is the first scalable intervention to improve personalised goal attainment for people with dementia. It could significantly improve care quality. Aims We aimed to explore system readiness for NIDUS–family, a scalable, personalised post-diagnostic support intervention. Method We conducted semi-structured interviews with professionals from dementia care services; the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided interviews and their thematic analysis. Results From 2022 to 2023, we interviewed a purposive sample of 21 professionals from seven English National Health Service, health and social care services. We identified three themes: (1) potential value of a personalised intervention – interviewees perceived the capacity for choice and supporting person-centred care as relative advantages over existing resources; (2) compatibility and deliverability with existing systems – the NIDUS–family intervention model was perceived as compatible with service goals and clients’ needs, but current service infrastructures, financing and commissioning briefs constraining resources to those at greatest need were seen as barriers to providing universal, post-diagnostic care; (3) fit with current workforce skills – the intervention model aligned well with staff development plans; delivery by non-clinically qualified staff was considered an advantage over current care options. Conclusions Translating evidence for scalable and effective post-diagnostic care into practice will support national policies to widen access to support and upskill support workers, but requires a greater focus on prevention in commissioning briefs and resource planning.

Keywords