Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer
Yuanmei Chen,
Qiuyuan Huang,
Junqiang Chen,
Yu Lin,
Xinyi Huang,
Qifeng Wang,
Yong Yang,
Bijuan Chen,
Yuling Ye,
Binglin Zheng,
Rong Qi,
Yushan Chen,
Yuanji Xu
Affiliations
Yuanmei Chen
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Qiuyuan Huang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Junqiang Chen
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Yu Lin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Xinyi Huang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Qifeng Wang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Yong Yang
Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Bijuan Chen
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Yuling Ye
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Binglin Zheng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Rong Qi
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Yushan Chen
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Yuanji Xu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital
Abstract Background To aid clinicians strategizing treatment for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), this retrospective study investigated associations between primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and prognosis in patients given surgical resection, radiotherapy, or both resection and radiotherapy. Methods The population comprised 568 patients with upper ESCC given definitive treatment, including 238, 216, and 114 who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, or combined radiotherapy and surgery. GTVp as a continuous variable was entered into the multivariate Cox model using penalized splines (P-splines) to determine the optimal cutoff value. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust imbalanced characteristics among the treatment groups. Results P-spline regression revealed a dependence of patient outcomes on GTVp, with 30 cm3 being an optimal cut-off for differences in overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). GTVp ≥30 cm3 was a negative independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. PSM analyses confirmed the prognostic value of GTVp. For GTVp < 30 cm3, no significant survival differences were observed among the 3 treatments. For GTVp ≥30 cm3, the worst 5-year OS rate was experienced by those given surgery. The 5-year PFS rate of patients given combined radiotherapy and surgery was significantly better than that of patients given radiotherapy. The surgical complications of patients given the combined treatment were comparable to those who received surgery, but radiation side effects were significantly lower. Conclusion GTVp is prognostic for OS and PFS in upper ESCC. For patients with GTVp ≥30 cm3, radiotherapy plus surgery was more effective than either treatment alone.