The Journal of Liquid Biopsy (Jun 2025)

Circulating tumor DNA monitoring in advanced mutated melanoma (LIQUID-MEL)

  • Martines Gianmarco,
  • Palazzi Carolina,
  • Monica Gregorio,
  • Verzè Michela,
  • Pluchino Monica,
  • Giudice Giulia Claire,
  • Maffezzoli Michele,
  • Mazzaschi Giulia,
  • Manuguerra Roberta,
  • Azzoni Cinzia,
  • Bottarelli Lorena,
  • Tiseo Marcello,
  • Perrone Fabiana,
  • Minari Roberta

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8
p. 100295

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma, but a percentage of patients did not show benefit. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a potential non-invasive tool for monitoring disease evolution and treatment response. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of ctDNA dynamics in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving ICIs, while exploring its role in the oncological course. Materials and methods: The LIQUID-MEL study is a prospective, single-centre pilot study including patients with BRAF/NRAS-mutant metastatic melanoma. ctDNA was quantified using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) at four different time points. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the correlation between shedding and progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Overall, 23 patients were included. At baseline, ctDNA was detectable in 5/23 (21.7 %) cases. Baseline ctDNA shedding was associated with shorter PFS (3.88 months vs. 0.69 months, p=0.012). A strong numerical trend was observed also in OS (12.66 months vs. 2.53 months, p=0.287). Shedding at baseline did not demonstrate independent prognostic or predictive value in the uni- and multivariable analysis. The longitudinal analysis revealed intriguing patterns of ctDNA shedding in individual patients. Conclusion: ctDNA detectability and its dynamic changes during treatment may have potential clinical utility in patients with metastatic melanoma, offering a valuable non-invasive tool for monitoring disease and treatment response. The small sample size limited the statistical power of the analysis. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate its role in routine clinical practice.

Keywords