Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Nov 2021)

Effectiveness of Automatic Planning of Fronto-orbital Advancement for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis

  • David García-Mato, PhD,
  • Antonio R. Porras, PhD,
  • Santiago Ochandiano, MD, DMD, PhD,
  • Gary F. Rogers, MD,
  • Roberto García-Leal, MD,
  • José I. Salmerón, MD PhD,
  • Javier Pascau, PhD,
  • Marius George Linguraru, DPhil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003937
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 11
p. e3937

Abstract

Read online

Background:. The surgical correction of metopic craniosynostosis usually relies on the subjective judgment of surgeons to determine the configuration of the cranial bone fragments and the degree of overcorrection. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a new approach for automatic planning of fronto-orbital advancement based on statistical shape models and including overcorrection. Methods:. This study presents a planning software to automatically estimate osteotomies in the fronto-orbital region and calculate the optimal configuration of the bone fragments required to achieve an optimal postoperative shape. The optimal cranial shape is obtained using a statistical head shape model built from 201 healthy subjects (age 23 ± 20 months; 89 girls). Automatic virtual plans were computed for nine patients (age 10.68 ± 1.73 months; four girls) with different degrees of overcorrection, and compared with manual plans designed by experienced surgeons. Results:. Postoperative cranial shapes generated by automatic interventional plans present accurate matching with normative morphology and enable to reduce the malformations in the fronto-orbital region by 82.01 ± 6.07%. The system took on average 19.22 seconds to provide the automatic plan, and allows for personalized levels of overcorrection. The automatic plans with an overcorrection of 7 mm in minimal frontal breadth provided the closest match (no significant difference) to the manual plans. Conclusions:. The automatic software technology effectively achieves correct cranial morphometrics and volumetrics with respect to normative cranial shapes. The automatic approach has the potential to reduce the duration of preoperative planning, reduce inter-surgeon variability, and provide consistent surgical outcomes.