Journal of Clinical Medicine (Mar 2023)

Study of Modifications Induced by Continued Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures on Standard Hemostasis Parameters

  • Marie Muller,
  • Julien Godet,
  • Xavier Delabranche,
  • Laurent Sattler,
  • David Millard,
  • Halim Marzak,
  • Paul Michel Mertes,
  • Annick Steib,
  • Lelia Grunebaum,
  • Laurence Jesel,
  • Charles Ambroise Tacquard

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062236
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 6
p. 2236

Abstract

Read online

Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used as an anticoagulant during the atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure to prevent the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Guidelines recommend an activated clotting time (ACT) greater than 300 s (s) based on studies of patients treated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for their AF. However, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have supplanted VKAs in AF and are now used as first-line therapy. It is recommended not to interrupt them during the procedure, which could interfere with the ACT measures. Objective: To assess the real-life relationship between ACT, DOAC concentrations, and UFH anti-Xa activity in patients treated by uninterrupted DOAC therapy. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study. We analyzed consecutive patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation under DOAC therapy. Results: In total, 40 patients were included, including 15 (37.5%), 20 (50.0%), and 5 (12.5%) on rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Baseline ACT was significantly lower in the apixaban group. ACT was linearly correlated with the residual concentration of apixaban and dabigatran but not with rivaroxaban. After UFH injection, ACT was linearly correlated with the anti-Xa activity, regardless of DOAC. Patients in the apixaban group received a higher total dose of UFH during the procedure to achieve a target ACT > 300 s, which resulted in significantly higher anti-Xa activity during the procedure. Conclusion: Our results raise the question of optimal management of intra-procedural heparin therapy and highlight the limitations of the ACT test, particularly in patients on apixaban.

Keywords