Maruyama Masao : mythe et réalités du « champion de la démocratie de l’après-guerre »

Abstract

Maruyama Masao wrote his most politically engaged texts between 1946 and 1951. Then a 30-year-old scholar and recently returned soldier, he was popular with readers who had also fought in the war. Yet he never enjoyed the same level of influence as his more experienced peers in the intellectual community. He retired from the public debate in 1952 due to ill health and, except for a short period around 1960 when a new Japan-United States security treaty was signed, devoted himself to academic pursuits. Maruyama’s fragmentary statements were widely reported and collections of his writings became bestsellers. He came to be seen, somewhat erroneously, as the representative thinker of Japan’s postwar democracy. Ever since, the Maruyama legend has been the focus of both criticism and praise, going beyond his original intentions. Using an approach borrowed from the sociology of knowledge, this paper seeks to examine the issues of social cognition and political engagement in his work.

Keywords

• Maruyama Masao
• Intellectuals
• Social cognition
• Postwar
• Political engagement