The Egyptian Heart Journal (Jul 2021)

Early results from an Egyptian transcatheter aortic valve registry (Egy-TVR)

  • Hesham Bahaa,
  • Yasser Sadek,
  • Ahmad E. Mostafa,
  • Diaa Kamal,
  • Mahmoud Baraka,
  • Mohammad Abdelghani,
  • Ahmed Hassan,
  • Ahmed Shehata,
  • Magdy Abdelhamid,
  • Ahmed Elguindy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-021-00189-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 73, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established and standard therapy for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at moderate or high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. Recently, it has proven non-inferior in patients with low surgical risk. However, due to its high cost, the availability of TAVI is variable worldwide. Our aim was to assess the demographic and clinical characteristics and short-term and long-term outcome of those patients. A medical registry is believed to be an excellent tool to perform a field analysis of patients’ course, documenting short, intermediate, and long-term outcomes. This is the first registry for patients who underwent TAVI in Egypt. Results Ninety-six patients were included in the study; some were retrospective, and the majority were prospective from 5 different cardiac centers from August 2012 till December 2017. The mean age of patients was 77 years SD ± 7.29; females were 52% of the patients and most of the patients were overweight (BMI 30.74, SD ± 6.83). Sixty-three percent of the patients were frail with Katz index ≤ 5. 3.5% had atrial fibrillation (AF) at presentation. General anesthesia was conducted in only 59.37% of the patients. Transfemoral access was the prevailing route of implantation (90%). The median hospital stay was 4 days. In-hospital and 30 days mortality was only 4.16%. Conclusion TAVI outcome in Egypt appeared to be very promising with in-hospital complication, and mortality rates being comparable to international registries (4.16% vs. 4.0% in TVT registry) denoting the procedure as safe and beneficial. Establishing a national registry is critical to highlighting strength and weaknesses as well as identifying key areas for improvements.

Keywords