Insights into Imaging (Feb 2020)

The cardiac conundrum: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of authorship in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies

  • Renato Cuocolo,
  • Andrea Ponsiglione,
  • Serena Dell’Aversana,
  • Ludovica D’Acierno,
  • Giulia Lassandro,
  • Lorenzo Ugga,
  • Valeria Romeo,
  • Elena Augusta Vola,
  • Arnaldo Stanzione,
  • Francesco Verde,
  • Valentina Picariello,
  • Iolanda Capaldo,
  • Giuseppe Pontillo,
  • Valeria Cantoni,
  • Roberta Green,
  • Mario Petretta,
  • Alberto Cuocolo,
  • Massimo Imbriaco

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00850-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose We aimed to assess the role of radiologists, cardiologists, and other medical and non-medical figures in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) research in the last 34 years, focusing on first and last authorship, number of published studies, and journal impact factors (IF). Methods Articles in the field of cardiac MRI were considered in this systematic review and retrospective bibliometric analysis. For included studies, the first and last authors were categorized as cardiologists, radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians, medical doctors (MD) with specialties in both cardiology and radiology/nuclear medicine, and other MD and non-MD. Differences in the number of papers published overall and by year and institution location for the first and last author category were assessed. Mean IF differences between author categories were also investigated. Results A total of 2053 articles were included in the final analysis. For the first authors (n = 2011), 52% were cardiologists, 22% radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians, 16% other MD, 10% other non-MD, and 1% both cardiologists and radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians. Similarly, the last authors (n = 2029) resulted 54% cardiologists, 22% radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians, 15% other MD, 8% other non-MD, and 2% both cardiologists and radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians. No significant differences due to institution location in the first and last authorship proportions were found. Average journal IF was significantly higher for cardiologist first and last authors when compared to that of radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians (both p < 0.0001). Conclusion Over 50% of studies in the field of cardiac MRI published in the last 34 years are conducted by cardiologists.

Keywords