Biomedicines (Nov 2023)

On- vs. Off-Pump CABG in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): A Multicenter Analysis

  • Christian Jörg Rustenbach,
  • Stefan Reichert,
  • Medhat Radwan,
  • Isabelle Doll,
  • Migdat Mustafi,
  • Attila Nemeth,
  • Spiros Lukas Marinos,
  • Rafal Berger,
  • Hardy Baumbach,
  • Monika Zdanyte,
  • Helene Haeberle,
  • Tulio Caldonazo,
  • Ibrahim Saqer,
  • Shekhar Saha,
  • Philipp Schnackenburg,
  • Ilija Djordjevic,
  • Ihor Krasivskyi,
  • Stefanie Wendt,
  • Elmar Kuhn,
  • Lina Maria Serna Higuita,
  • Torsten Doenst,
  • Christian Hagl,
  • Thorsten Wahlers,
  • Rodrigo Sandoval Boburg,
  • Christian Schlensak

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113043
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 11
p. 3043

Abstract

Read online

Objective: This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes and 30-day mortality in patients with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with (ONCAB) and without (OPCAB) the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: data from four university hospitals in Germany, spanning from January 2017 to December 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 551 patients were included in the study, and various demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were compared. Results: demographic parameters did not exhibit any differences. However, the OPCAB group displayed notably higher rates of preoperative renal insufficiency, urgent surgeries, and elevated EuroScore II and STS score. During surgery, the ONCAB group showed a significantly higher rate of complete revascularization, whereas the OPCAB group required fewer intraoperative transfusions. No disparities were observed in 30-day/in-hospital mortality for the entire cohort and the matched population between the two groups. Subsequent to surgery, the OPCAB group demonstrated significantly shorter mechanical ventilation times, reduced stays in the intensive care unit, and lower occurrences of ECLS therapy, acute kidney injury, delirium, and sepsis. Conclusions: the study’s findings indicate that OPCAB surgery presents a safe and viable alternative, yielding improved postoperative outcomes in this specific patient population compared to ONCAB surgery. Despite comparable 30-day/in-hospital mortality rates, OPCAB patients enjoyed advantages such as decreased mechanical ventilation durations, shorter ICU stays, and reduced incidences of ECLS therapy, acute kidney injury, delirium, and sepsis. These results underscore the potential benefits of employing OPCAB as a treatment approach for patients with coronary heart disease and reduced ejection fraction.

Keywords