Судебная Медицина (Dec 2023)

Shifting blame from the actions of the accused to medical professionals

  • Evgeny Kh. Barinov,
  • Svetlana G. Voevodina,
  • Andrey E. Barinov

DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/fm14224
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 4
pp. 439 – 445

Abstract

Read online

A constant, clear trend is observed toward the appointment of forensic medical examinations in criminal and civil claims to healthcare institutions and individual medical workers. In some cases, criminal cases were initiated against medical workers without sufficient grounds. In their grief, relatives are not always able to objectively assess the actions of medical workers, which is often the reason for contacting investigative and judicial instances. Lawyers also support them in this. Often, medical workers receive complaints because they do not know how to properly explain to the patient and relatives the complexity of the situation and insist on hospitalization. All this is taken into service by lawyers, including medical professionals. Thanks to their actions, the prosecutor’s office, investigation, and courts are forced to do unnecessary and not always necessary work. All the above has become more often manifested during the investigation and trials to mitigate the guilt of the accused in criminal cases that harm health. The defendant or the representative of the defense declares that the consequences of the injury caused to the victim or the death of the victim are the result of the improper actions of medical workers, that is, the victim received inappropriate medical care. Explaining the purpose pursued by these people is difficult. However, such statements only lead to a delay in investigative actions and trials, appointment of additional, and sometimes repeated, forensic medical examinations, including commissions. In court hearings, not only forensic medical experts who conducted examinations are called witnesses to the incident but also medical workers. The presented work provides an expert observation of the death of a 4-year-old child. During the investigation and trial, the issue of inappropriate medical care arose, and a forensic medical examination commission was appointed. The forensic medical examination revealed that the child received appropriate medical care and had no connection with bodily harm.

Keywords