SPE Polymers (Apr 2024)

Synthesis and performance evaluation of a novel zwitterionic quaternary copolymer for enhanced oil‐recovery application

  • Xiaoping Qin,
  • Zhaolin Xie,
  • Peng Tang,
  • Hui Yang,
  • Cuixia Li,
  • Xiaoliang Yang,
  • Tong Peng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.10120
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 2
pp. 206 – 216

Abstract

Read online

Abstract A novel quaternary copolymer of AA/AM/AOS/C16‐DMAAC was synthesized with acrylic acid (AA), acrylamide (AM), sodium α‐alkenyl‐sulfonate (AOS), and dimethyl‐hexadecyl‐allyl‐ammonium chloride (C16‐DMAAC), using ammonium persulfate and sodium bisulfate (NH4)2S2O8‐NaHSO3) as initiators. The structure of AA/AM/AOS/C16‐DMAAC was characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance hydrogen spectroscopy. It can be found that the thickening capacity, shearing resistance, temperature‐resistance, salt‐resistance, and emulsification properties of AA/AM/AOS/C16‐DMAAC were superior to those of most widely and cost‐effective partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) solution at the same concentration. Specifically, the viscosity retention rate of AA/AM/AOS/C16‐DMAAC (3000 mg/L) solution was 86%, which was better than that of HPAM solution (52%) after 30 s of mechanical shearing at 28000 r/min. In addition, the enhanced oil recovery of AA/AM/AOS/C16‐DMAAC solution was 16% at 65 °C, which was about 1.5 times higher than that of HPAM solution (11%). Significantly, successful synthesis of zwitterionic quaternary copolymer emphasizes the importance of a systematic approach to designing appropriate copolymers for enhanced oil recovery. Highlights A novel zwitterionic quaternary copolymer of AA/AM/AOS/C16‐DMAAC was successfully synthesized. The performance on thickening capacity, shearing resistance, temperature‐resistance, salt‐resistance, and emulsification properties of AA/AM/AOS/C16‐DMAAC was superior to that of the most widely used partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM). The enhanced oil recovery of AA/AM/AOS/C16‐DMAAC (16%) was about 1.5 times higher than that of HPAM (11%).

Keywords