Frontiers in Public Health (Nov 2022)

Seroepidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 on a partially vaccinated island in Brazil: Determinants of infection and vaccine response

  • José Cerbino-Neto,
  • José Cerbino-Neto,
  • José Cerbino-Neto,
  • Igor Tona Peres,
  • Margareth Catoia Varela,
  • Luciana Gomes Pedro Brandão,
  • Juliana Arruda de Matos,
  • Juliana Arruda de Matos,
  • Luiz Felipe Pinto,
  • Marcellus Dias da Costa,
  • Márcio Henrique de Oliveira Garcia,
  • Daniel Soranz,
  • Daniel Soranz,
  • Maria de Lourdes de Sousa Maia,
  • Marco Aurélio Krieger,
  • Rivaldo Venâncio da Cunha,
  • Luiz Antonio Bastos Camacho,
  • Otavio Ranzani,
  • Otavio Ranzani,
  • Silvio Hamacher,
  • Fernando Augusto Bozza,
  • Fernando Augusto Bozza,
  • Gerson Oliveira Penna

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1017337
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundA vaccination campaign targeted adults in response to the pandemic in the City of Rio de Janeiro.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and identify factors associated with seropositivity on vaccinated and unvaccinated residents.MethodsWe performed a seroepidemiologic survey in all residents of Paquetá Island, a neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro city, during the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out. Serological tests were performed from June 16 to June 19, 2021, and adjusted seropositivity rates were estimated by age and epidemiological variables. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted ORs for risk factors to SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in non-vaccinated individuals, and potential determinants of the magnitude of antibody responses in the seropositive population.ResultsWe included in the study 3,016 residents of Paquetá (83.5% of the island population). The crude seroprevalence of COVID-19 antibodies in our sample was 53.6% (95% CI = 51.0, 56.3). The risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in non-vaccinated individuals were history of confirmed previous COVID-19 infection (OR = 4.74; 95% CI = 3.3, 7.0), being a household contact of a case (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.5, 2.6) and in-person learning (OR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.4, 3.0). Potential determinants of the magnitude of antibody responses among the seropositive were hybrid immunity, the type of vaccine received, and time since the last vaccine dose. Being vaccinated with Pfizer or AstraZeneca (Beta = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.8, 2.6) determined higher antibody titers than those observed with CoronaVac (Beta = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.9, 1.5).ConclusionsOur study highlights the impact of vaccination on COVID-19 collective immunity even in a highly affected population, showing the difference in antibody titers achieved with different vaccines and how they wane with time, reinforcing how these factors should be considered when estimating effectiveness of a vaccination program at any given time. We also found that hybrid immunity was superior to both infection-induced and vaccine-induced immunity alone, and online learning protected students from COVID-19 exposure.

Keywords