PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Efficacy and safety of NOAC versus warfarin in AF patients with left atrial enlargement.

  • Victor Chien-Chia Wu,
  • Chun-Li Wang,
  • Shu-Ting Gan,
  • Michael Wu,
  • Shao-Wei Chen,
  • Chang-Fu Kuo,
  • Yu-Tung Huang,
  • Ming-Shien Wen,
  • Shang-Hung Chang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243866
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 12
p. e0243866

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundLittle is known about the effects of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left atrial enlargement (LAE).MethodsData of patients with AF were retrieved from Chang Gung Research Database during 2007-2016. We excluded patients who were not using oral anticoagulants, used anticoagulants for ResultsWe identified 40,777 patients who received a diagnosis of AF. After the exclusion criteria were applied, 6,445 patients remained, 4,922 with LAE, and they were followed up for 2.4 ±1.9 years. The mean age of the patients was 77.32 ± 0.18 in the NOAC group and 76.58 ± 6.91 in the warfarin group (p 0.05). The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.26 ± 1.05 in the NOAC group and 3.07 ± 1.12 in the warfarin group (p 0.05). Furthermore, the mean LA diameter was 4.75 ± 0.63 cm in the warfarin group and 4.79 ± 0.69 cm in the warfarin group (p > 0.05). Among patients with LAE, NOAC was associated with significantly reduced IS/SE events (CRR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52-0.77), no difference in major bleeding (CRR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.78-1.05), and significantly reduced death from any cause (aHR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.52-0.80) compared with warfarin.ConclusionsIn elderly patients with AF and LAE, NOAC was associated with reduced IS/SE and death from any cause compared with warfarin, whereas no difference in major bleeding was observed between these treatments.