International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation (Sep 2021)
Improving the spatiotemporal fusion accuracy of fractional vegetation cover in agricultural regions by combining vegetation growth models
Abstract
Spatiotemporal fusion has provided a feasible way to generate fractional vegetation cover (FVC) data with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, when the currently available spatiotemporal fusion methods are applied over agricultural regions, they usually underestimate high FVC values at the peak vegetation growth stage with medium FVC values as base data. This mainly results from inconsistencies in the temporal variations between fine- and coarse-resolution data if substantial temporal changes occur in vegetation. Therefore, a Spatial and Temporal Fusion method combining with Vegetation Growth Models (STF-VGM) was proposed to address this problem in this study, which incorporates vegetation growth models into the fusion process. Unlike other spatiotemporal fusion methods that mainly rely on changes in coarse-resolution data for prediction, STF-VGM fully utilizes available coarse- and fine-resolution time series data, including uncontaminated information in cloud/cloud shadow contaminated images. By establishing vegetation growth models with time series data, a conversion relationship between coarse- and fine-resolution FVC that changes along with the nonlinear vegetation change process can be extracted. STF-VGM makes prediction based on this variable relationship. A typical agricultural region located in the North China Plain was selected as the study area. The validation results indicated that the prediction accuracy for high FVC values was significantly improved using STF-VGM compared to the commonly used Enhanced Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (ESTARFM) and Flexible Spatiotemporal DAta Fusion (FSDAF) methods (STF-VGM: coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.9491, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.0650, average difference (AD) = -0.0092; ESTARFM: R2 = 0.9341, RMSE = 0.1127, AD = -0.0631; FSDAF: R2 = 0.9224, RMSE = 0.1110, AD = -0.0599). The satisfactory performance of STF-VGM was also achieved in predicting FVC values at other vegetation growth stages (early growth stage: R2 = 0.8277, RMSE = 0.0440, AD = 0.0027; rapid growth stage: R2 = 0.9183, RMSE = 0.0844, AD = 0.0500). In addition, STF-VGM also has the potential to improve the spatiotemporal fusion accuracy of other vegetation parameters and vegetation indices, which will be evaluated in the future.