Frontiers in Endocrinology (Jun 2024)

Proficiency in performing radiofrequency ablation procedure for non-functioning benign thyroid nodules: a qualitative rather than quantitative matter

  • Spyridon Chytiris,
  • Marsida Teliti,
  • Marsida Teliti,
  • Laura Croce,
  • Laura Croce,
  • Francesca Coperchini,
  • Beatrice Grillini,
  • Matteo Cerutti,
  • Rodolfo Fonte,
  • Flavia Magri,
  • Flavia Magri,
  • Mario Rotondi,
  • Mario Rotondi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1399912
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an emerging non-surgical treatment for benign thyroid nodules (BTN). Despite its proven safety profile, data on the learning curve (LC) required to achieve proficiency are still lacking.Materials and methodsThe first 179 RFA procedures performed by a single operator in patients with non-functioning BTN were retrospectively analyzed. Six-month nodule volume reduction rate (VRR) ≥ 50% was regarded as reflection of proficiency. Multiple linear regression analysis has been performed to determine the relationship between the VRR and clinical variables. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts were plotted to assess LCs for all consecutive procedures and in relation to basal nodule size. In details, Group 1 (G1): 57 patients with small nodules (<10 ml); Group 2 (G2): 87 patients with intermediate nodules (10 – 25 ml); Group 3 (G3): 35 patients with large size (> 25 ml).ResultsLC of all 179 procedures showed 3 phases: initial learning (1–39 procedures); consolidation (40–145 procedures); and experienced period (146–179 procedures). For G1 and G2 proficiency is achieved starting from the 10th procedure within the group (or 37th considering consecutively all procedures) and from the 59th procedure within the group (or 116th considering consecutively all procedures), respectively. LC of G3 did not detect operator proficiency.ConclusionSpecific LCs exist concerning the basal size of the nodule treated with RFA. In nodules with baseline volume > 25 ml suboptimal VRR has to be expected. Previously achieved experience on small-intermediate nodules does not seem to provide advantages in terms of higher VRR in the treatment of large nodules. Other potential and non-modifiable factors likely play a key role in the final volume reduction independently from the increased skill of the operator.

Keywords