Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (Dec 2017)

A content analysis of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) strategies for communicating about clinical research participation online

  • Elizabeth Flood-Grady,
  • Samantha R. Paige,
  • Nicki Karimipour,
  • Paul A. Harris,
  • Linda B. Cottler,
  • Janice L. Krieger

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1
pp. 340 – 351

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThere is a dearth of literature providing guidance on how to effectively communicate about clinical research (CR).MethodsUsing the transactional model of communication, a content analysis of the investigator (n=62) and participant (n=18) Web sites of institutions funded through the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) was conducted to identify their strategies (e.g., messages) for communicating about CR participation.ResultsCTSAs targeted investigators with CR participation content across the main Web sites, although most CTSAs (n=55; 88.7%) also included CR participation content for participants. In total, 18 CTSAs (29%) hosted participant Web sites. Participant sites included 13 message types about CR participation (e.g., registry enrollment) and 5 additional channels (e.g., email, phone number) to communicate about CR. However, many CTSA participant Web sites excluded information explaining the CR process and offered CR content exclusively in English.ConclusionCTSAs should identify their target audience and design strategies (e.g., messages, channels) accordingly.

Keywords