Extinderea practicii evaluării în România: De la programele finanțate de Uniunea Europeană la politicile publice

Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative. 2011;13(29):101-117

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative

ISSN: 1454-1378 (Print)

Publisher: Babes-Bolyai University

Society/Institution: Public Administration Department

LCC Subject Category: Law | Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)

Country of publisher: Romania

Language of fulltext: Romanian

Full-text formats available: PDF

 

AUTHORS

Marian NICA (Doctorand, Facultatea de Administraţie şi Management Public, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti, Bucureşti, România)

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 6 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

<p>By using evaluations for the socio-economic and development programs, the European Union (EU) played a decisive role for the introduction of evaluation as a management tool in Romania, as well as in the other Member States. A proper management of the implementation of the EU programs has been a constant concern of the Romanian administration. Since its accession to the EU on January 1, 2007, Romania became responsible for administrating the evaluation of EU funded programs, under the Extended Decentralization Implementation System (EDIS). The paper is trying to examine how the experience gained throughout the independent evaluations of the pre-accession funds generated knowledge for learning and could further contribute to the development of the public policies evaluation practice in Romania. The hypothesis is that experience generated by independent evaluation use of pre-accession EU funds will contribute to further expansion of the evaluation practice to the national public policies. The methodology employed in this paper relies on empirical research of all relevant documents related to the both interim evaluations: Phare and Structural Instruments. The opinion of the key stakeholders on the evaluation practice was also considered, by applying a specific questionnaire regarding the evaluation use, combined with interviews of the key stakeholders.</p>