Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (Jan 2024)
Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 60 years and older
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to examine the clinical outcomes of double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients aged ≥60 years. Methods: Anatomical DB-ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts was performed in 13 patients aged ≥60 years at our institution between June 2012 and May 2018. The patients included seven men and six women, and the mean age at surgery was 65.0 years (range, 60–73 years). The mean time from injury to surgery was 80.5 months (range, 1–480 months), and the mean follow-up time was 26.2 months (range, 24–42 months). All patients were assessed based on physical examination findings, clinical scores, Kellgren–Lawrence grades preoperatively and at the final postoperative follow-up, intraoperative meniscal or chondral lesions, and perioperative complications. Status of returning to sports for all patients was assessed at the final follow-up. Results: The mean side-to-side differences by arthrometer improved from 4.3 mm (range, 2–8 mm) to 0.9 mm (range, 0–2 mm), and the positive pivot-shift test decreased from 100% to 8%. The mean extensor muscle strength was 93.3% (range, 74–116%) postoperatively. The mean Lysholm score improved from 71.1 (range, 27-85) to 95.2 (range, 89-100). Ten of the 13 patients (77%) returned to their pre-injury level of sports performance, and one patient (8%) returned to sports with less intensity. Intraoperatively, meniscal tears were observed in 10 patients (77%), and chondral lesions >grade 2 were observed in 11 (85%). One patient developed perioperative complications. At the final follow-up, the Kellgren–Lawrence grade worsened in only one patient. No re-injury or infection was observed, and revision surgery was not required for any patients. Conclusions: Anatomical DB-ACL reconstruction could provide satisfactory clinical outcomes and knee function restoration in patients aged ≥60 years. Level of evidence: A retrospective study, case series (IV).