Frontiers in Virology (Nov 2023)
Evolution driven by a varying host environment selects for distinct HIV-1 entry phenotypes and other informative variants
Abstract
HIV-1 generates remarkable intra- and inter-host viral diversity during infection. In the response to the dynamic selective pressures of the host’s environment, HIV-1 evolves distinct phenotypes—biological features that provide fitness advantages. The transmitted form of HIV-1 has been shown to require a high density of CD4 on the target cell surface (as found on CD4+ T cells) and typically uses C–C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) as a coreceptor during entry. This phenotype is referred to as R5T cell-tropic (or R5 T-tropic); however, HIV-1 can switch to a secondary coreceptor, C–X–C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), resulting in a X4T cell-tropic phenotype. Macrophage-tropic (or M-tropic) HIV-1 can evolve to efficiently enter cells expressing low densities of CD4 on their surface (such as macrophages/microglia). So far only CCR5-using M-tropic viruses have been found. M-tropic HIV-1 is most frequently found within the central nervous system (CNS), and infection of the CNS has been associated with neurologic impairment. It has been shown that interferon-resistant phenotypes have a selective advantage during transmission, but the underlying mechanism of this is still unclear. During untreated infection, HIV-1 evolves under selective pressure from both the humoral/antibody response and CD8+ T-cell killing. Sufficiently potent antiviral therapy can suppress viral replication, but if the antiviral drugs are not powerful enough to stop replication, then the replicating virus will evolve drug resistance. HIV-1 phenotypes are highly relevant to treatment efforts, clinical outcomes, vaccine studies, and cure strategies. Therefore, it is critical to understand the dynamics of the host environment that drive these phenotypes and how they affect HIV-1 pathogenesis. This review will provide a comprehensive discussion of HIV-1 entry and transmission, and drug-resistant phenotypes. Finally, we will assess the methods used in previous and current research to characterize these phenotypes.
Keywords
