Diagnostics (May 2022)

Correlation Analysis of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG and Neutralizing Antibody against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants after Vaccination

  • Nuchjira Takheaw,
  • Chalerm Liwsrisakun,
  • Warawut Chaiwong,
  • Witida Laopajon,
  • Supansa Pata,
  • Juthamas Inchai,
  • Pilaiporn Duangjit,
  • Chaicharn Pothirat,
  • Chaiwat Bumroongkit,
  • Athavudh Deesomchok,
  • Theerakorn Theerakittikul,
  • Atikun Limsukon,
  • Pattraporn Tajarernmuang,
  • Nutchanok Niyatiwatchanchai,
  • Konlawij Trongtrakul,
  • Watchara Kasinrerk

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061315
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 6
p. 1315

Abstract

Read online

Various vaccines have been developed to control the COVID-19 pandemic, but the available vaccines were developed using ancestral SARS-CoV-2 wild-type (WT) strains. Commercial anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody assays have been established and employed for validation of vaccine efficacy. However, these assays were developed before the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) emerged. It is unclear whether anti-RBD IgG levels can predict immunity against VOCs. In this study, we determined the correlations between the levels of anti-RBD IgG and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated subjects. After vaccination, 100% of subjects showed an anti-RBD IgG response, whereas 82, 79, 30, 75, and 2% showed NAb responses against WT, Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, respectively. A high correlation was observed between anti-RBD IgG and NAbs against WT, Alpha, Beta, and Delta, but not so for the Omicron NAbs. Among subjects with high levels of anti-RBD IgG, 93, 93, 71, 93, and 0% of them had NAbs against WT, Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, respectively. These results indicate that anti-RBD IgG levels cannot be used as a predictor for the presence of NAbs against the globally dominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

Keywords