Health Science Reports (Jul 2022)

Effect of low dose acetylsalicylic acid and anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in COVID‐19, analytical cross‐sectional study

  • Muhammad B. Malik,
  • Samar A. Amer,
  • Eric Merrell,
  • Ronald Russo,
  • Jeffrey B. Riley,
  • Austin Scro,
  • Elizabeth James,
  • Anderson Anuforo,
  • Soumya Adhikari,
  • Rosalie Siciliano,
  • Philip Chebaya,
  • Edward Darling,
  • Michael Kuhn,
  • Gary Nieman,
  • Ahmed Shawkat,
  • Hani Aiash

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.699
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 4
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background and aims The therapeutic strategy for the treatment of known sequelae of COVID‐19 has shifted from reactive to preventative. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and anticoagulants on COVID‐19 related morbidity and mortality. Methods This record‐based analytical cross‐sectional study targeted 539 COVID‐19 patients in a single United States medical center between March and December 2020. Through a random stratified sample, we recruited outpatient (n = 206) and inpatient (n = 333) cases from three management protocols, including standard care (SC) (n = 399), low‐dose ASA only (ASA) (n = 112), and anticoagulation only (AC) (n = 28). Collected data included demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome measure was inpatient admission. Exploratory secondary outcome measures included length of stay, 30‐day readmission rates, medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission, need for mechanical ventilation, the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), bleeding events, clotting events, and mortality. The collected data were coded and analyzed using standard tests. Results Age, mean number of comorbidities, and all individual comorbidities except for asthma, and malignancy were significantly lower in the SC compared to ASA and AC. After adjusting for age and comorbidity via binary logistic regression models, no statistical differences were found between groups for the studied outcomes. When compared to the SC group, ASA had lower 30‐day readmission rates (odds ration [OR] 0.81 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–1.88, p = 0.63), MICU admission (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.34–1.17, p = 0.32), ARDS (OR 0.71 95% CI 0.33–1.52, p = 0.38), and death (OR 0.85 95% CI 0.36–1.99, p = 0.71). Conclusion Low‐dose ASA has a nonsignificant but potentially protective role in reducing the risk of COVID‐19 related morbidity and mortality. Our data suggests a trend toward reduced 30‐day readmission rates, ARDS, MICU admissions, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality compared to the standard management protocol. Further randomized control trials are needed to establish causal effects.

Keywords