The Astrophysical Journal (Jan 2024)

The NANOGrav 12.5-Year Data Set: Dispersion Measure Misestimations with Varying Bandwidths

  • Sophia Valentina Sosa Fiscella,
  • Michael T. Lam,
  • Zaven Arzoumanian,
  • Harsha Blumer,
  • Paul R. Brook,
  • H. Thankful Cromartie,
  • Megan E. DeCesar,
  • Paul B. Demorest,
  • Timothy Dolch,
  • Justin A. Ellis,
  • Robert D. Ferdman,
  • Elizabeth C. Ferrara,
  • Emmanuel Fonseca,
  • Nate Garver-Daniels,
  • Peter A. Gentile,
  • Deborah C. Good,
  • Megan L. Jones,
  • Duncan R. Lorimer,
  • Jing Luo,
  • Ryan S. Lynch,
  • Maura A. McLaughlin,
  • Cherry Ng,
  • David J. Nice,
  • Timothy T. Pennucci,
  • Nihan S. Pol,
  • Scott M. Ransom,
  • Renée Spiewak,
  • Ingrid H. Stairs,
  • Kevin Stovall,
  • Joseph K. Swiggum,
  • Sarah J. Vigeland

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad2858
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 966, no. 1
p. 95

Abstract

Read online

Noise characterization for pulsar-timing applications accounts for interstellar dispersion by assuming a known frequency dependence of the delay it introduces in the times of arrival (TOAs). However, calculations of this delay suffer from misestimations due to other chromatic effects in the observations. The precision in modeling dispersion is dependent on the observed bandwidth. In this work, we calculate the offsets in infinite-frequency TOAs due to misestimations in the modeling of dispersion when using varying bandwidths at the Green Bank Telescope. We use a set of broadband observations of PSR J1643−1224, a pulsar with unusual chromatic timing behavior. We artificially restricted these observations to a narrowband frequency range, then used both the broad- and narrowband data sets to calculate residuals with a timing model that does not account for time variations in the dispersion. By fitting the resulting residuals to a dispersion model and comparing the fits, we quantify the error introduced in the timing parameters due to using a reduced frequency range. Moreover, by calculating the autocovariance function of the parameters, we obtained a characteristic timescale over which the dispersion misestimates are correlated. For PSR J1643−1224, which has one of the highest dispersion measures (DM) in the NANOGrav pulsar timing array, we find that the infinite-frequency TOAs suffer from a systematic offset of ∼22 μ s due to incomplete frequency sampling, with correlations over about one month. For lower-DM pulsars, the offset is ∼7 μ s. This error quantification can be used to provide more robust noise modeling in the NANOGrav data, thereby increasing the sensitivity and improving the parameter estimation in gravitational wave searches.

Keywords