Cancers (Feb 2024)

The Nitro Group Reshapes the Effects of Pyrido[3,4-<i>g</i>]quinazoline Derivatives on DYRK/CLK Activity and RNA Splicing in Glioblastoma Cells

  • Sophia S. Borisevich,
  • Tatiana E. Aksinina,
  • Margarita G. Ilyina,
  • Victoria O. Shender,
  • Ksenia S. Anufrieva,
  • Georgij P. Arapidi,
  • Nadezhda V. Antipova,
  • Fabrice Anizon,
  • Yannick J. Esvan,
  • Francis Giraud,
  • Victor V. Tatarskiy,
  • Pascale Moreau,
  • Mikhail I. Shakhparonov,
  • Marat S. Pavlyukov,
  • Alexander A. Shtil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040834
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 4
p. 834

Abstract

Read online

Serine-threonine protein kinases of the DYRK and CLK families regulate a variety of vital cellular functions. In particular, these enzymes phosphorylate proteins involved in pre-mRNA splicing. Targeting splicing with pharmacological DYRK/CLK inhibitors emerged as a promising anticancer strategy. Investigation of the pyrido[3,4-g]quinazoline scaffold led to the discovery of DYRK/CLK binders with differential potency against individual enzyme isoforms. Exploring the structure–activity relationship within this chemotype, we demonstrated that two structurally close compounds, pyrido[3,4-g]quinazoline-2,10-diamine 1 and 10-nitro pyrido[3,4-g]quinazoline-2-amine 2, differentially inhibited DYRK1-4 and CLK1-3 protein kinases in vitro. Unlike compound 1, compound 2 efficiently inhibited DYRK3 and CLK4 isoenzymes at nanomolar concentrations. Quantum chemical calculations, docking and molecular dynamic simulations of complexes of 1 and 2 with DYRK3 and CLK4 identified a dramatic difference in electron donor-acceptor properties critical for preferential interaction of 2 with these targets. Subsequent transcriptome and proteome analyses of patient-derived glioblastoma (GBM) neurospheres treated with 2 revealed that this compound impaired CLK4 interactions with spliceosomal proteins, thereby altering RNA splicing. Importantly, 2 affected the genes that perform critical functions for cancer cells including DNA damage response, p53 signaling and transcription. Altogether, these results provide a mechanistic basis for the therapeutic efficacy of 2 previously demonstrated in in vivo GBM models.

Keywords