The Pan African Medical Journal (Mar 2019)

Comparing static and outreach immunization strategies and associated factors in Uganda, Nov-Dec 2016

  • Fred Nsubuga,
  • Steven Ndugwa Kabwama,
  • Immaculate Ampeire,
  • Henry Luzze,
  • Pande Gerald,
  • Lilian Bulage,
  • Opar Bernard Toliva

DOI
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.123.16093
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 32, no. 123

Abstract

Read online

INTRODUCTION: The government of Uganda aims at reducing childhood morbidity through provision of immunization services. We compared the proportion of children 12-33 months reached using either static or outreach immunization strategies and factors affecting utilization of routine vaccination services in order to inform policy updates. METHODS: We adopted the 2015 vaccination coverage cluster survey technique. The sample selection was based on a stratified three-stage sample design. Using the Fleiss formula, a sample of 50 enumeration areas was sufficient to generate immunization coverages at each region. A total of 200 enumeration areas were selected for the survey. Thirty households were selected per enumeration area. Epi-Info software was used to calculate weighted coverage estimates. RESULTS: Among the 2231 vaccinated children aged 12-23 months who participated in the survey, 68.1% received immunization services from a health unit and 10.6% from outreaches. The factors that affected utilization of routine vaccination services were; accessibility, where 78.2% resided within 5km from a health facility. 29.7% missed vaccination due to lack of vaccines at the health facility. Other reasons were lack of supplies at 39.2% and because the caretaker had other things to do, 26.4%. The survey showed 1.8% (40/2271) respondents had not vaccinated their children. Among these, 70% said they had not vaccinated their child because they were busy doing other things and 27.5% had not done so because of lack of motivation. CONCLUSION: Almost 7 in 10 children aged 12-23 months access vaccination at health facilities. There is evidence of parental apathy as well as misconceptions about vaccination.

Keywords