Frontiers in Medicine (Nov 2023)

Alternative biomarkers of tuberculosis infection in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

  • Elisa Petruccioli,
  • Linda Petrone,
  • Saeid Najafi-Fard,
  • Assunta Navarra,
  • Valentina Vanini,
  • Gilda Cuzzi,
  • Fabrizio Cantini,
  • Gina Gualano,
  • Fabrizio Palmieri,
  • Delia Goletti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1271632
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionIFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) are one of the referral tests for diagnosing tuberculosis infection (TBI). To improve IGRAs accuracy, several markers have been investigated. Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), taking biological drugs, have a higher risk to progress to TB-disease compared to the general population. In several guidelines, annual TBI screening is recommended for patients undergoing biological therapy. Aim of this study was to investigate, within the QuantiFERON-TB-Plus (QFT-Plus) platform, if beside IFN-γ, alternative biomarkers help to diagnose TBI-IMID patients.MethodsWe enrolled 146 subjects: 46 with TB disease, 20 HD, 35 with TBI and 45 with TBI and IMID. Thirteen IMID subjects with a QFT-Plus negative result were diagnosed as TBI based on radiological evidence of TBI. We evaluated the IP-10 level in response to TB1 and TB2 peptides of QFT-Plus assay and we compared these results with the standardized assay based on IFN-γ. Multiplex immune assay was performed on plasma from TB1 and TB2 tubes and results were analyzed by a gradient boosting machine (GBM) as learning technique.ResultsTBI-IMID showed a significant decreased IP-10 level in response to TB1 and TB2 stimulation compared to TBI-NO IMID (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0002). The TBI-IMID showed a moderate agreement between the IP-10-based assay and QFT-Plus scores. In TBI-IMID, QFT-Plus showed 70% sensitivity for TBI detection whereas the IP-10-based assay reached 61%. Tests combination increased the sensitivity for TBI diagnosis up to 77%. By a GBM, we explored alternative biomarkers for diagnosing TBI in IMID population reaching 89% sensitivity. In particular, the signature based on IL-2, IP-10, and IL-9 detection was associated with TB status (infection/disease). However, by applying the cut-off identified by ROC analysis, comparing TB and TBI with the HD group, within the IMID population, we did not improve the accuracy for TBI-diagnosis. Similarly, this signature did not improve TBI diagnosis in IMID with radiological evidence of TBI but negative QFT-Plus score.DiscussionTo develop alternative strategies for TBI immune-diagnosis, future studies are needed to evaluate the memory response of TBI defined by radiological tools. These results may help in tuberculosis management of patients taking lifelong immune-suppressive drugs.

Keywords