Applied Sciences (Apr 2025)

Assessing the Metrological Reliability of Static Firing Tests of Rocket Motors Through the Evaluation of Thrust and Total Impulse Measurement Uncertainty

  • Fernando de Paula Leite Castor,
  • Carlos Roberto Hall Barbosa,
  • Elcio Cruz de Oliveira

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084280
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 8
p. 4280

Abstract

Read online

A solid propellant rocket motor is a propulsion system used in missiles and rockets that burns a propellant, typically composed of a mixture of fuel and an oxidizer, to generate the thrust necessary to propel the vehicle. During both the development and quality assurance phases, static firing tests of rocket motors are conducted to verify whether the system requirements meet the product specifications. These tests aim to produce two main types of graphs, “thrust versus burn time” and “pressure versus burn time,” both generated by the rocket motor during the burn. While thrust and pressure are important parameters in the design of a rocket motor, total impulse is the quantity that incorporates the crucial element of time, measuring how high a rocket can be launched. To ensure greater metrological reliability in static tests of rocket motors, it is important to carefully evaluate the uncertainty levels in the measurement chain of the data acquisition system. This work aims to assess the uncertainty levels expressed in the calculated total impulse values during a static firing test of a rocket motor at the Propulsion Jets Testing Laboratory of the Brazilian Army Technological Center. To estimate the measurement uncertainty of the chain in question, approaches based on combined and expanded uncertainty theories were adopted. These methodologies consider Type A and Type B uncertainties, providing a comprehensive and rigorous analysis. In addition to the uncertainties previously mentioned, the oscillation of the measured signal should also be recognized as a contributing factor to the overall uncertainty in the calculation of total impulse. By incorporating these various sources of uncertainty, we can achieve a more comprehensive and reliable understanding of the uncertainty associated with the measurements obtained from the measurement chain. This analysis yields a measurement uncertainty of 0.24% for thrust and 0.007% for impulse, both calculated at a confidence level of 95.45%.

Keywords