Breast Cancer Research (Jan 2024)

TBCRC 039: a phase II study of preoperative ruxolitinib with or without paclitaxel for triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer

  • Filipa Lynce,
  • Laura E. Stevens,
  • Zheqi Li,
  • Jane E. Brock,
  • Anushree Gulvady,
  • Ying Huang,
  • Faina Nakhlis,
  • Ashka Patel,
  • Jeremy M. Force,
  • Tufia C. Haddad,
  • Naoto Ueno,
  • Vered Stearns,
  • Antonio C. Wolff,
  • Amy S. Clark,
  • Jennifer R. Bellon,
  • Edward T. Richardson,
  • Justin M. Balko,
  • Ian E. Krop,
  • Eric P. Winer,
  • Paulina Lange,
  • E. Shelley Hwang,
  • Tari A. King,
  • Sara M. Tolaney,
  • Alastair Thompson,
  • Gaorav P. Gupta,
  • Elizabeth A. Mittendorf,
  • Meredith M. Regan,
  • Beth Overmoyer,
  • Kornelia Polyak

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-024-01774-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have overall poor clinical outcomes, with triple-negative IBC (TN-IBC) being associated with the worst survival, warranting the investigation of novel therapies. Preclinical studies implied that ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/2 inhibitor, may be an effective therapy for TN-IBC. Methods We conducted a randomized phase II study with nested window-of-opportunity in TN-IBC. Treatment-naïve patients received a 7-day run-in of RUX alone or RUX plus paclitaxel (PAC). After the run-in, those who received RUX alone proceeded to neoadjuvant therapy with either RUX + PAC or PAC alone for 12 weeks; those who had received RUX + PAC continued treatment for 12 weeks. All patients subsequently received 4 cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide prior to surgery. Research tumor biopsies were performed at baseline (pre-run-in) and after run-in therapy. Tumors were evaluated for phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) by immunostaining, and a subset was also analyzed by RNA-seq. The primary endpoint was the percent of pSTAT3-positive pre-run-in tumors that became pSTAT3-negative. Secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR). Results Overall, 23 patients were enrolled, of whom 21 completed preoperative therapy. Two patients achieved pCR (8.7%). pSTAT3 and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling decreased in post-run-in biopsies of RUX-treated samples, while sustained treatment with RUX + PAC upregulated IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling compared to RUX alone. Both treatments decreased GZMB+ T cells implying immune suppression. RUX alone effectively inhibited JAK/STAT3 signaling but its combination with PAC led to incomplete inhibition. The immune suppressive effects of RUX alone and in combination may negate its growth inhibitory effects on cancer cells. Conclusion In summary, the use of RUX in TN-IBC was associated with a decrease in pSTAT3 levels despite lack of clinical benefit. Cancer cell-specific-targeting of JAK2/STAT3 or combinations with immunotherapy may be required for further evaluation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling as a cancer therapeutic target. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02876302. Registered 23 August 2016.

Keywords