Multi-omic diagnostics of prostate cancer in the presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Matt Spick,
Ammara Muazzam,
Hardev Pandha,
Agnieszka Michael,
Lee A. Gethings,
Christopher J. Hughes,
Nyasha Munjoma,
Robert S. Plumb,
Ian D. Wilson,
Anthony D. Whetton,
Paul A. Townsend,
Nophar Geifman
Affiliations
Matt Spick
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YH, United Kingdom
Ammara Muazzam
The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Center, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4GJ, United Kingdom
Hardev Pandha
School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Agnieszka Michael
School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Lee A. Gethings
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YH, United Kingdom; Waters Corporation, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 4AX, United Kingdom; Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
Christopher J. Hughes
Waters Corporation, Milford, MA 01757, USA
Nyasha Munjoma
Waters Corporation, Milford, MA 01757, USA
Robert S. Plumb
Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, Burlington Danes Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
Ian D. Wilson
Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, Burlington Danes Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
Anthony D. Whetton
Veterinary Health Innovation Engine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YH, United Kingdom; School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YH, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Center, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4GJ, United Kingdom
Paul A. Townsend
School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Center, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4GJ, United Kingdom; Corresponding author. School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
Nophar Geifman
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YH, United Kingdom; Corresponding author. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YH, United Kingdom.
There is an unmet need for improved diagnostic testing and risk prediction for cases of prostate cancer (PCa) to improve care and reduce overtreatment of indolent disease. Here we have analysed the serum proteome and lipidome of 262 study participants by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, including participants diagnosed with PCa, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), or otherwise healthy volunteers, with the aim of improving biomarker specificity. Although a two-class machine learning model separated PCa from controls with sensitivity of 0.82 and specificity of 0.95, adding BPH resulted in a statistically significant decline in specificity for prostate cancer to 0.76, with half of BPH cases being misclassified by the model as PCa. A small number of biomarkers differentiating between BPH and prostate cancer were identified, including proteins in MAP Kinase pathways, as well as in lipids containing oleic acid; these may offer a route to greater specificity. These results highlight, however, that whilst there are opportunities for machine learning, these will only be achieved by use of appropriate training sets that include confounding comorbidities, especially when calculating the specificity of a test.