Comparison of Classical and Inverse Calibration Equations in Chemical Analysis

Abstract

Chemical analysis adopts a calibration curve to establish the relationship between the measuring technique’s response and the target analyte’s standard concentration. The calibration equation is established using regression analysis to verify the response of a chemical instrument to the known properties of materials that served as standard values. An adequate calibration equation ensures the performance of these instruments. There are two kinds of calibration equations: classical equations and inverse equations. For the classical equation, the standard values are independent, and the instrument’s response is dependent. The inverse equation is the opposite: the instrument’s response is the independent value. For the new response value, the calculation of the new measurement by the classical equation must be transformed into a complex form to calculate the measurement values. However, the measurement values of the inverse equation could be computed directly. Different forms of calibration equations besides the linear equation could be used for the inverse calibration equation. This study used measurement data sets from two kinds of humidity sensors and nine data sets from the literature to evaluate the predictive performance of two calibration equations. Four criteria were proposed to evaluate the predictive ability of two calibration equations. The study found that the inverse calibration equation could be an effective tool for complex calibration equations in chemical analysis. The precision of the instrument’s response is essential to ensure predictive performance. The inverse calibration equation could be embedded into the measurement device, and then intelligent instruments could be enhanced.

Keywords

• calibration
• classical equation
• inverse equation
• predictive performance