Efficacy of Repeating Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People with COPD: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Angela T Burge,1– 3 Carla Malaguti,1,4 Mariana Hoffman,1 Alan Shiell,5 Christine F McDonald,3,6,7 David J Berlowitz,3,6,7 Anne E Holland1– 3 1Respiratory Research@Alfred, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 2Physiotherapy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 3Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; 4Faculty of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil; 5Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia; 6Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; 7Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaCorrespondence: Angela T Burge, Respiratory Research@Alfred, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia, Tel [phone], Fax [phone], Email [email protected]: Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People with COPD undertake repeat programs, but synthesis of evidence regarding such practice has not been undertaken. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the effects of repeating pulmonary rehabilitation subsequent to an initial program in people with COPD.Methods: Studies where participants with COPD undertook > 1 pulmonary rehabilitation program were included, incorporating RCT (randomized controlled trial) and non-randomized studies. Electronic database searches were undertaken. Two authors independently undertook study identification, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL); secondary outcomes were exercise capacity, hospitalizations and exacerbations, adherence, mortality and adverse events. Narrative synthesis was undertaken for clinically heterogeneous trials. Data from RCTs and non-randomized studies were not combined for analysis.Results: Ten included studies (2 RCTs) involved 907 participants with COPD (n=653 had undertaken > 1 program). The majority of studies were at high risk of bias. One RCT (n=33) reported no difference in HRQol after a repeat program vs usual care following exacerbation (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire dyspnea domain score MD 0.4, 95% CI − 0.5 to 3). In stable patients, clinically important and statistically significant improvements in HRQoL and exercise capacity were reported after repeat programs, but of a smaller magnitude than initial programs. There was evidence for reductions in exacerbations and hospitalizations, and shorter hospital length of stay for patients who repeated a program twice in 12 months compared to those who repeated once. No data for mortality or adverse events were available.Conclusion: This systematic review provides limited evidence for benefits of repeating pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD, including improved HRQoL and exercise capacity, and reduced hospitalizations. However, most studies have high risk of bias, which reduces the certainty of these conclusions.Study Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020215093).Keywords: COPD, repeat pulmonary rehabilitation, systematic review

Keywords

• copd
• repeat pulmonary rehabilitation
• systematic review