International Journal for Equity in Health (Jul 2020)

Quality of care for Black and Latina women living with HIV in the U.S.: a qualitative study

  • Whitney S. Rice,
  • Faith E. Fletcher,
  • Busola Akingbade,
  • Mary Kan,
  • Samantha Whitfield,
  • Shericia Ross,
  • C. Ann Gakumo,
  • Igho Ofotokun,
  • Deborah J. Konkle-Parker,
  • Mardge H. Cohen,
  • Gina M. Wingood,
  • Brian W. Pence,
  • Adaora A. Adimora,
  • Tonya N. Taylor,
  • Tracey E. Wilson,
  • Sheri D. Weiser,
  • Mirjam-Colette Kempf,
  • Bulent Turan,
  • Janet M. Turan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01230-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Ending the HIV epidemic requires that women living with HIV (WLWH) have access to structurally competent HIV-related and other health care. WLWH may not regularly engage in care due to inadequate quality; however, women’s perspectives on the quality of care they receive are understudied. Methods We conducted 12 focus groups and three in-depth interviews with Black (90%) and Latina (11%) WLWH enrolled in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study in Atlanta, GA, Birmingham, AL, Brooklyn, NY, Chapel Hill, NC, Chicago, IL, and Jackson, MS from November 2017 to May 2018 (n = 92). We used a semi-structured format to facilitate discussions about satisfaction and dissatisfaction with health care engagement experiences, and suggestions for improvement, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using thematic analysis. Results Themes emerged related to women’s health care satisfaction or dissatisfaction at the provider, clinic, and systems levels and across Institute of Medicine-defined quality of care domains (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, patient-centeredness, safety and timeliness). Women’s degree of care satisfaction was driven by: 1) knowledge-based care resulting in desired outcomes (effectiveness); 2) coordination, continuity and necessity of care (efficiency); 3) perceived disparities in care (equity); 4) care delivery characterized by compassion, nonjudgment, accommodation, and autonomous decision-making (patient-centeredness); 5) attention to avoiding side effects and over-medicalization (safety); and 6) limited wait time (timeliness). Conclusions Quality of care represents a key changeable lever affecting engage in care among WLWH. The communities most proximally affected by HIV should be key stakeholders in HIV-related quality assurance. Findings highlight aspects of the health care experience valued by WLWH, and potential participatory, patient-driven avenues for improvement.

Keywords