BMJ Open (Sep 2020)

Crizanlizumab and comparators for adults with sickle cell disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • George Joseph,
  • Howard Thom,
  • Jeroen Jansen,
  • Hung-Yuan Cheng,
  • Jason Shafrin,
  • Lauren Zhao,
  • Subhajit Gupta,
  • Nirmish Shah

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034147
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 9

Abstract

Read online

Objectives Treatment options for preventing vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are limited, especially if hydroxyurea treatment has failed or is contraindicated. A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of crizanlizumab for older adolescent and adult (≥16 years old) SCD patients.Methods The SLR included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and uncontrolled studies. Bayesian NMA of VOC, all-cause hospitalisation days and adverse events were conducted.Results The SLR identified 51 studies and 9 RCTs on 14 treatments that met the NMA inclusion criteria. The NMA found that crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg was associated with a reduction in VOC (HR 0.55, 95% credible interval (0.43, 0.69); Bayesian probability of superiority >0.99), all-cause hospitalisation days (0.58 (0.50, 0.68); >0.99) and no evidence of difference on adverse events (0.91 (0.59, 1.43) 0.66) or serious adverse events (0.93 (0.47, 1.87); 0.59) compared with placebo. The HR for reduction in VOC for crizanlizumab relative to L-glutamine was (0.67 (0.50, 0.88); >0.99). These results were sensitive to assumptions regarding whether patient age is an effect modifier.Conclusions This NMA provides preliminary evidence comparing the efficacy of crizanlizumab with other treatments for VOC prevention.