Construction Materials (Feb 2024)

Influence of the Addition of Carbon Fibres on Gypsum–PCM Mixtures

  • Vincent Claude,
  • Stéphane Charron,
  • Sébastien Hustin,
  • Fabrice de Barquin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater4010009
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 154 – 172

Abstract

Read online

This study investigated the influence of carbon fibre addition on the thermal performances of gypsum compositions doped with 20 wt % of phase-change material (PCM) microspheres. The influences of the length (150 µm/3 mm) and additive amount (0.5/2/4 wt %) of the carbon fibres were investigated. Characterizations were performed throughout the various preparation steps to check that the materials aligned with the construction standards. The consistency of compositions with 3 mm carbon fibres did not seem to be suitable for construction implementation. On the contrary, thanks to an adequate amount of thinning additive, the compositions with 150 µm carbon fibres showed acceptable implementation properties. The materials were tested in a climatic chamber under temperature cycles that were either favourable (15 °C/40 °C) or unfavourable (20 °C/40 °C) for the regeneration process of the PCM. Tests with a plateau at 40 °C/15 °C were also performed to obtain a better understanding of the thermal behaviours. The tests were performed using walls with thicknesses of either 15 mm or 30 mm. The results show that, in all cases, the addition of carbon fibres was not beneficial to the thermal performance of the PCM. These observations were in opposition to those of other studies in the literature. We hypothesized that the performances of these composite materials would be different under convective or conductive fluxes. It was also shown that, in unfavourable conditions (20 °C/40 °C), the large thickness of 30 mm could not be fully regenerated, even in the compositions with carbon fibres. However, the PCM of boxes with 15 mm thick walls was deactivated faster (after ~400 min) than that of those with 30 mm thick walls (after ~700 min). Finally, the laboratory results were compared with the results of a previous large-scale study. It was estimated that, despite a surface-to-volume ratio that was 25 times higher, the energy storage efficiency was only increased by a factor of 2.6 between our laboratory study and the large-scale study. Hence, the PCM storage process seems to be mainly involved in maintaining the temperature of the gypsum walls rather than the temperature of the air.

Keywords