Cancer Management and Research (Nov 2021)

Clinical Impact of Cachexia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Received Chemoradiotherapy

  • Hayashi N,
  • Sato Y,
  • Fujiwara Y,
  • Fukuda N,
  • Wang X,
  • Nakano K,
  • Urasaki T,
  • Ohmoto A,
  • Ono M,
  • Tomomatsu J,
  • Sato Y,
  • Mitani H,
  • Toshiyasu T,
  • Takahashi S

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 13
pp. 8377 – 8385

Abstract

Read online

Naomi Hayashi,1 Yasuyoshi Sato,1 Yu Fujiwara,1,2 Naoki Fukuda,1 Xiaofei Wang,1 Kenji Nakano,1 Testuya Urasaki,1 Akihiro Ohmoto,1 Makiko Ono,1 Junichi Tomomatsu,1 Yukiko Sato,3 Hiroki Mitani,4 Takashi Toshiyasu,5 Shunji Takahashi1 1Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York City, NY, USA; 3Pathology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; 4Head and Neck Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; 5Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Yasuyoshi SatoThe Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, JapanTel +8135200111Fax +81335200141Email [email protected]: There have been few reports on the evaluation of cancer cachexia based on skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) in patients with head and neck cancer.Patients and Methods: One hundred and ninety-two head and neck cancer patients were enrolled. In definitive and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy settings, clinical outcomes were compared between cachexia and non-cachexia patients.Results: Forty patients were diagnosed with cachexia (20.8%). In the definitive setting, overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in the cachexia group (3-year OS: 50.0% vs 88.5%; p < 0.01), and multivariate analysis identified UICC stage IV, baseline albumin of < 4 and cachexia as poor prognostic factors. However, cachexia was not significant in the adjuvant setting.Conclusion: Cancer cachexia was negatively associated with prognosis in patients with HNC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy. Nutritional intervention during chemoradiotherapy may improve survival in these patients.Keywords: head and neck cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, sarcopenia, cachexia, muscle, skeletal, chemoradiotherapy, prognosis

Keywords