Digital Diagnostics (Jul 2023)

Evaluation of fetal absorbed doses from computed tomography examinations of pregnant patients: A systematic review

  • Aleksandr V. Vodovatov,
  • Olga A. Golchenko,
  • Irina A. Mashchenko,
  • Darya V. Alekseeva,
  • Larisa A. Chipiga,
  • Ivan V. Khutornoy,
  • Polina V. Kozlova,
  • Gennady E. Trufanov,
  • Polina S. Druzhinina,
  • Sergey A. Ryzhov,
  • Ilia V. Soldatov

DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/DD472150
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 2
pp. 170 – 184

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND: Currently, no systematic data are available on fetal radiation exposure as a result of radiographic studies during pregnancy. Consequently, there are no approved methods of its calculation that can be used in clinical practice. It is especially relevant for computed tomography scans as it is a widely used and highly informative method of diagnostic imaging associated with high exposure levels. AIM: to systematize currently available data on radiation dose absorbed by the fetus from computed tomography scans in pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search for publications in Russian and English was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and еLibrary. The final analysis included 12 papers including 8 studies using human body phantoms, 3 retrospective studies and one prospective clinical study. RESULTS: Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans as well as whole-body scans were found to be associated with the highest fetal radiation exposure. However, in none of the publications the fetal exposure limit was exceeded. CONCLUSION: Clinically indicated non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans in pregnant women are not likely to be associated with the fetal absorbed doses that exceed the limit of 100 mGy regardless of the scanned area. However, this limit might be exceeded in case of performing multiple studies or if multiphase abdominal or pelvic computed tomography scans, or whole-body computed tomography scans are performed in patients with multiple trauma. In these cases, a decision regarding the need for these investigations should be made by a multi-disciplinary team (including radiation safety specialists, diagnostic radiologists and clinicians) based on the results of additional risk assessment.

Keywords