PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Cord compression defined by MRI is the driving factor behind the decision to operate in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy despite poor correlation with disease severity.

  • Bryn Hilton,
  • Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell,
  • Benjamin M Davies,
  • Jibin Francis,
  • Richard J Mannion,
  • Rikin Trivedi,
  • Ivan Timofeev,
  • John R Crawford,
  • Douglas Hay,
  • Rodney J Laing,
  • Peter J Hutchinson,
  • Mark R N Kotter

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226020
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 12
p. e0226020

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesThe mainstay treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is surgical decompression. Not all cases, however, are suitable for surgery. Recent international guidelines advise surgery for moderate to severe disease as well as progressive mild disease. The goal of this study was to examine the factors in current practice that drive the decision to operate in DCM.Study designRetrospective cohort study.Methods1 year of cervical spine MRI scans (N = 1123) were reviewed to identify patients with DCM with sufficient clinical documentation (N = 39). Variables at surgical assessment were recorded: age, sex, clinical signs and symptoms of DCM, disease severity, and quantitative MRI measures of cord compression. Bivariate correlations were used to compare each variable with the decision to offer the patient an operation. Subsequent multivariable analysis incorporated all significant bivariate correlations.ResultsOf the 39 patients identified, 25 (64%) were offered an operation. The decision to operate was significantly associated with narrower non-pathological canal and cord diameters as well as cord compression ratio, explaining 50% of the variance. In a multivariable model, only cord compression ratio was significant (p = 0.017). Examination findings, symptoms, functional disability, disease severity, disease progression, and demographic factors were all non-significant.ConclusionsCord compression emerged as the main factor in surgical decision-making prior to the publication of recent guidelines. Newly identified predictors of post-operative outcome were not significantly associated with decision to operate.