Haematologica (Mar 2018)

Melphalan 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 for autologous transplantation in myeloma: results from the Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party

  • Holger W. Auner,
  • Simona Iacobelli,
  • Giulia Sbianchi,
  • Cora Knol-Bout,
  • Didier Blaise,
  • Nigel H. Russell,
  • Jane F. Apperley,
  • David Pohlreich,
  • Paul V. Browne,
  • Guido Kobbe,
  • Cecilia Isaksson,
  • Stig Lenhoff,
  • Christof Scheid,
  • Cyrille Touzeau,
  • Esa Jantunen,
  • Achilles Anagnostopoulos,
  • Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha,
  • Alina Tanase,
  • Nicolaas Schaap,
  • Wieslaw Wiktor-Jedrzejczak,
  • Marta Krejci,
  • Stefan O. Schönland,
  • Curly Morris,
  • Laurent Garderet,
  • Nicolaus Kröger

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.181339
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 103, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m2 is standard conditioning prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma, but a dose of 140 mg/m2 is often used in clinical practice in patients perceived to be at risk of excess toxicity. To determine whether melphalan 200 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 are equally effective and tolerable in clinically relevant patient subgroups we analyzed 1964 first single autologous transplantation episodes using a series of Cox proportional-hazards models. Overall survival, progression-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, hematopoietic recovery and second primary malignancy rates were not significantly different between the melphalan 140 mg/m2 (n=245) and melphalan 200 mg/m2 (n=1719) groups. Multivariable subgroup analysis showed that disease status at transplantation interacted with overall survival, progression-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse, with a significant advantage associated with melphalan 200 mg/m2 in patients transplanted in less than partial response (adjusted hazard ratios for melphalan 200 mg/m2 versus melphalan 140 mg/m2: 0.5, 0.54, and 0.56). In contrast, transplantation in very good partial or complete response significantly favored melphalan 140 mg/m2 for overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.02). Age, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment, gender, or Karnofsky score did not interact with overall/progression-free survival or relapse rate in the melphalan dose groups. There were no significant survival or relapse rate differences between melphalan 200 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 patients with high-risk or standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In conclusion, remission status at the time of transplantation may favor the use of melphalan 200 mg/m2 or melphalan 140 mg/m2 for key transplant outcomes (NCT01362972).