Surgery may not benefit patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieved clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the long-term outcome of the watch and wait (WW) strategy and surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and methods: This prospective cohort study included 84 patients who achieved clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). They were divided into the WW group (n = 58) and surgery group (SG, n = 26). Patients in the SG underwent total mesorectal excision. The study site was the Peking University Cancer Hospital. Results: Eighty-four patients were included (58 and 26 in the WW group and SG, respectively). A total of 76·9% of the patients in the SG achieved pathological complete response (pCR) and 23·1% of the patients had a residual tumor. The total recurrence and metastasis rate was 15·4% (4/26) in the SG and 18·9% (11/58) in the WW group. There was no significant difference in the recurrence and metastasis rate between the two groups. In the WW group, 9 cases developed tumor regrowth during follow-up and underwent salvage surgery. The overall survival rate of the WW group (96·6% vs 92·3%) was not significantly different from that of the SG (P > 0·05). The WW patients also retained their anal sphincter function and avoided surgery-related complications. Conclusion: The WW strategy is a feasible treatment option in patients with cCR after NCRT. Surgery may not bring benefits to these cCR patients.

Keywords

• Locally advanced rectal cancer
• Clinical complete response
• Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy