Australian Journal of Psychology (Dec 2022)

Older adults’ experiences of a computerised cognitive training intervention: a mixed methods study

  • K. I. Trenorden,
  • M. J. Hull,
  • A. Lampit,
  • D. Greaves,
  • H. A. D. Keage

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2036581
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 74, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Objective Computerised cognitive training (CCT) is gaining in popularity and has shown evidence of efficacy in improving cognitive function. Older adults’ experiences of a CCT intervention were explored using mixed methods, focussing on computer literacy and engagement. Methods Seven older adults completed pre-operative CCT (pre-habilitation) and a 12-week post-operative CCT (rehabilitation) intervention as part of an ongoing clinical trial. Qualitative interviews were conducted post-training to explore CCT experiences and data were analysed using thematic analysis. Three questionnaires were used to characterise participants: Computer Proficiency Questionnaire-12, Short Computer Anxiety Scale, User-Engagement Scale-Short Form. Results Four key themes were identified from the interview data: “I appreciate a challenge”, “Persevering through frustration led to accomplishment”, “When I start, I finish”, and “It’s manageable but with support”. Conclusion All participants had positive CCT experiences, including those with low computer-literacy skills. CCT interventions should consider utilising regular supervised sessions, and achievable, challenging exercises, while focussing on reducing frustration to improve experiences with CCT. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Computerised cognitive training (CCT) has demonstrated evidence for improving overall and domain-specific cognitive function in healthy older adults, and older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Low adherence is common in CCT interventions, which limits beneficial cognitive outcomes. Negative experiences in CCT interventions are major drivers of non-adherence and attrition. What this topic adds: Experiences during CCT often fluctuate, and frustration occurs when participants compare their perceived and actual abilities. Recommendations from qualitative interviews include the use of attainable, challenging exercises that can be completed more efficiently with improved skill. Support strategies contributed to positive experiences overall and included regular supervised sessions (e.g., once a week), phone numbers to call for assistance, and screen sharing software to resolve computer problems.

Keywords