Biomedical Journal (Apr 2019)

A comparison between non-sedation and general endotracheal anesthesia for retrograde endoscopic common bile duct stone removal: A tertiary center experience

  • Chih-Ming Liang,
  • Chung-Mou Kuo,
  • Lung-Sheng Lu,
  • Cheng-Kun Wu,
  • Cheng-En Tsai,
  • Ming-Te Kuo,
  • Yi-Chun Chiu,
  • Wen-Chen Tai,
  • Yuan-Hung Kuo,
  • Chung-Huang Kuo,
  • Seng-Kee Chuah,
  • Chi-Sin Changchien

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 42, no. 2
pp. 131 – 136

Abstract

Read online

Background: Conscious sedation is not routinely administered for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in many countries. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the safety and rate of success and complications during common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction using ERCPs performed with no-sedation (NS) or under general endotracheal anesthesia (GET). Methods: The medical records of all patients who underwent ERCP for biliary stone extraction between January 2010 and September 2013 were reviewed, and patients classified to the NS and GET groups. The primary outcomes were the rate of success of complete stone removal and rate of complications, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), perforation, bleeding, pneumonia, and mortality within 30 days post-ERCP. Operative time was recorded for analysis. Results: During the study period, 630 patients underwent ERCP, 402 with NS and 105 with GET. Among the 402 patients in the NS group, 37 (9.2%) could not complete the procedure due to an inability to tolerate the procedure. The success rate of complete stone extraction was higher among patients in the GET group than the NS group (94.3% versus 75.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). The rate of contrast injection into the pancreatic duct was higher for the NS than GET group (24.9% versus 15.2%, respectively; p = 0.008). Although non-significant, there was a higher incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in the NS than in the GET group (10.4% versus 5.7%, respectively; p = 0.105), while the incidence of pneumonia was higher for the GET group. Biliary pancreatitis, contrast injection into the pancreatic duct and an operation time ≥30 min were independent risks factors for PEP. Conclusions: ERCP under GET is effective for CBD stone removal, but with slightly higher pneumonia rate after the procedure than non-sedated ERCP. Keywords: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Non sedation, General endotracheal anesthesia, Post-ERCP pancreatitis, Endoscopic papillotomy, Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation