پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین (Apr 2013)

Critical Survey of Mulla Sadra's Viewpoint in Explanation of Compatibility between Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom

  • Tavakkol Kouhi Geeglu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2013.1417
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 97 – 116

Abstract

Read online

Mulla Sadra, on the one hand, proves detailed foreknowledge of God based on the rule of “simple reality is whole things” and using the rule of particular gradation in existence. On the other hand, from his standpoint, sometimes freedom is coextensive with willingness and sometimes relying on the same rule of "simple reality is whole things" – that analyzes causality in the form of epiphany – is equivalent to the subjectivity of God. In this philosophical system, the conflict between divine foreknowledge and human freedom is resolved with regard to activity of divine knowledge–rather than passivity of divine knowledge–and, also, belonging of divine knowledge to the voluntary human action gets resolved. But it seems that Mulla Sadra’s antecedents and favorite solution is not very effective.

Keywords