Environmental Research Letters (Jan 2024)

The greenhouse gas performance of selected biodegradable and recalcitrant plastics in U.S. landfills

  • Yixuan Wang,
  • James W Levis,
  • Morton A Barlaz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad50ec
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 6
p. 064078

Abstract

Read online

Biodegradable plastics are often considered to exhibit superior environmental performance compared to conventional recalcitrant plastics. Here, we assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of selected biodegradable and recalcitrant plastics made from both fossil and biogenic carbon (C) as disposed in a national average U.S. landfill. This average landfill incorporates consideration of size, precipitation, landfill gas management, and gas collection installation schedule. The GHG emissions of an 80% biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL _f ) made from fossil C and a 2% biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) (PBS _b ) made from biogenic C were evaluated to represent the range of anaerobic biodegradabilities. The 2% biodegradable PBS _b has lower GHG emissions than the 80% biodegradable PCL _f in the national average landfill. In the best case, which includes aggressive gas collection, conversion of gas to energy, and disposal in a large landfill, the PCL _f results in 2423 kg CO _2 e/mt, which is well above PBS _b (−1956 kg CO _2 e/mt), a hypothetical biogenic and 80% biodegradable PCL _b (4739 kg CO _2 e/mt), and recalcitrant fossil plastic (0 kg CO _2 e/mt). From a disposal perspective, a recalcitrant biogenic plastic is optimal given the long-term storage of carbon. This study informs the direction of materials research to develop materials that minimize their overall environmental footprint at end-of-life.

Keywords